Dana O Lynch

Trademark attorney of record on 380 registered marks in USPTO records.

Top Trademark Attorney
380registrations of record
7list appearances
#4best rank achieved
18states represented

Recognition

Top Trademark Attorney #9 — Maryland 2011 · 11 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #4 — Maryland 2010 · 16 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #4 — Pennsylvania 2009 · 25 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #8 — Maryland 2008 · 16 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #7 — Pennsylvania 2007 · 23 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #4 — Maryland 2002 · 14 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #5 — Maryland 2001 · 12 registrations

Registrations by year

20181
20171
201610
201513
201417
201322
201214
201121
201024
200944
200838
200740
200620
200519
200413
20039
200238
200132
20004

Where their clients are incorporated

Maryland138 registrations
Delaware79 registrations
Pennsylvania78 registrations
DC13 registrations
Illinois12 registrations
Virginia11 registrations
Oregon8 registrations
Arizona4 registrations

Based on the owner address of record. Companies frequently incorporate in one state while operating in another, so this reflects client domicile rather than where the attorney practises.

Display this on your site

If this is your profile, you are welcome to display the badge. It links back to this page.

Option 1 — script embed

Renders the badge and keeps it current if your ranking changes.

Option 2 — plain HTML

For sites that block third-party scripts.

You are responsible for compliance with your state bar's advertising rules, which in some states govern how awards and rankings may be displayed. Our methodology is published at /guides/attorneys/methodology/ so you can point to it if your bar requires the basis of an award to be disclosed.

How this list is compiled

TrademarkToolbox Top Trademark Attorney lists are not a ranking of attorney quality. Rank is based solely on the number of trademark registrations that list the attorney as attorney of record, for applications tied to the jurisdictions listed above. It measures filing volume, nothing else.

Volume reflects firm size, practice model and client mix. A solo practitioner handling a small number of complex matters will rank below a high-volume filing practice, and that says nothing about the quality of either. These lists are not an endorsement, a recommendation, or a substitute for your own due diligence when choosing counsel.

Data comes from USPTO public records as indexed by TrademarkToolbox. Attorney names are matched conservatively: we do not merge similar names, so an attorney who appears in the record under more than one form may be undercounted. Counts include registered marks only, by registration year. Full methodology · Request a correction or removal