John M Cone

Trademark attorney of record on 933 registered marks in USPTO records.

Your photo could be here

Upgrade this profile to add a photo, biography, website and contact details. Your photo also appears beside your name in the rankings.

Upgrade your profile
Top Trademark Attorney
933registrations of record
4list appearances
#3best rank achieved
24states represented

Recognition

Top Trademark Attorney #6 — Nevada 2010 · 30 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #7 — Texas 2003 · 19 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #8 — Texas 2002 · 24 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #3 — Texas 2001 · 24 registrations

Registrations by year

20263
20253
202414
202319
202210
202115
202011
201914
20187
201737
201632
201521
201417
201337
201234
201139
201066
200953
200883
200759

Where their clients are incorporated

Texas348 registrations
Delaware166 registrations
Nevada139 registrations
California73 registrations
Iowa25 registrations
Florida9 registrations
New York8 registrations
Illinois3 registrations

Based on the owner address of record. Companies frequently incorporate in one state while operating in another, so this reflects client domicile rather than where the attorney practises.

Display this on your site

If this is your profile, you are welcome to display the badge. It links back to this page.

Option 1 — script embed

Renders the badge and keeps it current if your ranking changes.

Option 2 — plain HTML

For sites that block third-party scripts.

You are responsible for compliance with your state bar's advertising rules, which in some states govern how awards and rankings may be displayed. Our methodology is published at /guides/attorneys/methodology/ so you can point to it if your bar requires the basis of an award to be disclosed.

How this list is compiled

TrademarkToolbox Top Trademark Attorney lists are not a ranking of attorney quality. Rank is based solely on the number of trademark registrations that list the attorney as attorney of record, for applications tied to the jurisdictions listed above. It measures filing volume, nothing else.

Volume reflects firm size, practice model and client mix. A solo practitioner handling a small number of complex matters will rank below a high-volume filing practice, and that says nothing about the quality of either. These lists are not an endorsement, a recommendation, or a substitute for your own due diligence when choosing counsel.

Data comes from USPTO public records as indexed by TrademarkToolbox. Attorney names are matched conservatively: we do not merge similar names, so an attorney who appears in the record under more than one form may be undercounted. Counts include registered marks only, by registration year. Full methodology · Request a correction or removal