Kit M Stetina

Trademark attorney of record on 964 registered marks in USPTO records.

Top Trademark Attorney
964registrations of record
6list appearances
#3best rank achieved
23states represented

Recognition

Top Trademark Attorney #7 — California 2008 · 55 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #10 — California 2007 · 43 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #3 — California 2006 · 52 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #7 — California 2005 · 35 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #3 — California 2003 · 49 registrations
Top Trademark Attorney #3 — California 2000 · 38 registrations

Registrations by year

20251
202412
202319
202223
202115
202016
201926
201827
201735
201626
201558
201451
201345
201226
201143
201041
200946
200868
200753
200666

Where their clients are incorporated

California686 registrations
Nevada63 registrations
Delaware39 registrations
New Jersey20 registrations
Texas16 registrations
Washington13 registrations
Florida12 registrations
Wyoming10 registrations

Based on the owner address of record. Companies frequently incorporate in one state while operating in another, so this reflects client domicile rather than where the attorney practises.

Display this on your site

If this is your profile, you are welcome to display the badge. It links back to this page.

Option 1 — script embed

Renders the badge and keeps it current if your ranking changes.

Option 2 — plain HTML

For sites that block third-party scripts.

You are responsible for compliance with your state bar's advertising rules, which in some states govern how awards and rankings may be displayed. Our methodology is published at /guides/attorneys/methodology/ so you can point to it if your bar requires the basis of an award to be disclosed.

How this list is compiled

TrademarkToolbox Top Trademark Attorney lists are not a ranking of attorney quality. Rank is based solely on the number of trademark registrations that list the attorney as attorney of record, for applications tied to the jurisdictions listed above. It measures filing volume, nothing else.

Volume reflects firm size, practice model and client mix. A solo practitioner handling a small number of complex matters will rank below a high-volume filing practice, and that says nothing about the quality of either. These lists are not an endorsement, a recommendation, or a substitute for your own due diligence when choosing counsel.

Data comes from USPTO public records as indexed by TrademarkToolbox. Attorney names are matched conservatively: we do not merge similar names, so an attorney who appears in the record under more than one form may be undercounted. Counts include registered marks only, by registration year. Full methodology · Request a correction or removal